Acquit Gosnell?

 Great point made by Kristen Hatten. Ms. Hatten states that this is what has happened since abortion was allowed by the Supreme Court due to judicial fiat by the justices. The very existence of this malevolent and savage practice of infanticide called "abortion" has led to this result and it begs the question how many more so called Drs. practice state permitted infanticide at late term . There are without doubt definitely more as there is proof via the website linked to below. Do states really have the grounds to convict Mr. Gosnell ( He is not fit to be a doctor as his actions do plenty of harm and are akin to Menegele).

Ms. Hatten makes an interesting observation that Mr. Gosnell should be acquitted yet disgraced everyday of his life and attention should be brought to his actions and to the actions of those who do not perform late term abortions and the rest of them who perform the procedure late term.

I wonder what they are going to do about the person who does this savagery in D.C., will they investigate likely not as Gosnell did it for 30 years?



http://liveactionnews.org/why-kermit-gosnell-should-be-acquitted/

Miltary Chaplaincy and the current issue of their service

The  Constitution of the United States guarantees the practice of Free Speech and Religion and if you are not interested in either of these things you can also decide not to participate in either action by your silence.

Currently, in the military there is a regulation against what might be considered" hard core Witnessing". I am not against the promotion of one's faith and I also do not approve of coercion being used to demagogue others to my beliefs and in a military setting coercion should be discouraged. It is also fine if two different people of differing faiths talk of faith by mutual consent and this should not be restricted.

I do not agree with Mr.. Weinstein's assertion that ,"Hearing the Gospel of Jesus Christ is akin to spiritual rape and treason and that it is unconstitutional." The Gospel is not harmful and can be ignored and should in no way be used as a tool of coercion by chaplains. But the Gospel should not be shut off from discussion from those who desire to hear,discuss it and be served by the chaplains. This even goes for the other faiths who should be allowed free practice and speech as well. In America, we are told that we are many people of differing faiths and opinions and it is at least my belief that we should tolerate differing beliefs and not necessarily agree with them if we disagree. Toleration meaning not union but knowing of their existence and not begrudging them for existing, yet disagreeing on articles of faith.

I am not currently a member of the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod , but perhaps this is the reason they do not have military chaplains.

Below are a couple of articles on the viewpoints of the Chaplain of the Senate and Breitbart whose views are divergent from one another.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/05/01/Breaking-Pentagon-Confirms-Will-Court-Martial-Soldiers-Who-Share-Christian-Faith

http://www.christianpost.com/news/military-chaplains-must-contend-with-hate-speech-accusations-inclusive-prayers-not-an-issue-senate-chaplain-says-94955/